The site has a very clear terrain form preserved in the landscape and is one of the few objects of this type in Upper Silesia.

History of the object

The motte-and-bailey castle in Kielcza dates to the 13th-14th centuries. The origin of small defensive structures, erected on artificially raised mounds or natural hills and surrounded by a moat, is associated with the Normans and Western Europe, where such objects were common as early as the mid-ninth century, and according to some the oldest may even date from the eighth century. In France, these types of mounded settlement are referred to as motte, while in Germany the term Wasserburge is used.

In Poland, the so-called motte-and-bailey castles are usually dated to the 13th-15th centuries. Such settlements became common in the second half of the 13th century, most probably the majority of them were erected in the 14th century, in the 15th century they slowly began to fall into disuse, and the period of their functioning ended at the beginning of the 16th century, although individual settlements survived until the 18th century. According to L. Kajzer, tower castles were an element of the symbolism of the knighthood state and were created and shaped along with its other determinants. Castle experts estimate that there were about ten times more small knight’s castles, “defensive mansions” in Poland than there were large brick castle complexes. In the 14th century they were already very popular and numerous in the cultural landscape of the Polish Middle Ages.

Description of the structure

The monument is located in the north-eastern part of the village, by a small river, which is a left tributary of the Mała Panwia river (ca. 160 m south of the river), next to the local cemetery.

The hillfort in Kielcza is a good example of the remnants of a late-medieval, small, wooden-earth settlement with a residential and defensive function, which was most probably a knight’s residence. The settlement is circular in plan and has a diameter of about 25 m. The height of the cone-mound is about 5 m and it is overgrown with tall trees and bushes.

In 1957 and 1972 archaeological surveys were carried out at the site (J. Kaźmierczyk, F. Lachowicz and E. Tomczak, respectively). During the work a cultural layer was recorded and fragments of late medieval pottery were found, which confirmed the dating of the site.

In general, thanks to archaeological excavations carried out throughout the country, we now know what medieval wooden-earth fortified settlements looked like and how they were built. Due to their small size, they are also referred to as hillforts or knight’s mansions, or even as “wooden castles”. Sites with permanent access to water and defensible in nature were preferred for the location of the settlements. The settlements were usually located in wetlands, meadows and marshes in the immediate vicinity of small river courses, which provided access to water and limited the access to the site, and thus increased its defensibility. The site in Kielcza is a good example of that. Some settlements were built on low hills dominating the surroundings or on elevated promontories of river terraces. According to J. Kaźmierczyk, the location of particular motte-and-bailey castles in Silesia is to a large extent connected with the course of borders of particular principalities.

In general, the “classical” so-called knight’s castle-town was a relatively small, modest residence and in fact a very simple defensive structure, such as the site in Kielcza. It had a solid wooden residential and defensive tower, built in the log technique and placed on an artificially raised mound-embankment. The earthen mound with a tower was surrounded by a wide moat, which was excavated during the construction of the embankment. On the one hand, raising a mound made the settlement more inaccessible and therefore increased its defensibility; on the other hand, it was often necessary and served to isolate the residence-manor from the marshy ground. The height of preserved mounds is usually only a few meters, their bases are usually circular or slightly oval in plan, much less quadrilateral, and their diameters usually range from 20-50 meters. In the case of castles built on hills and promontories, the workload was saved because the artificial embankment did not have to be high and the moat did not necessarily have to surround the object - it was enough to cut it off from the rest of the promontory with this obstacle. It is believed that the tower, together with any accompanying small buildings, was surrounded by a wooden palisade or fence, and the mound itself was reinforced with e.g. stilts or fascines, so that it was as stable and resistant to landslides as possible. A fortified settlement of this kind certainly had a wooden bridge over a wide moat. Relics of settlements have also been discovered that were originally more developed and somewhat larger, e.g. they consisted of two mounds or had an additional rampart (originally probably wooden and earth) and a second moat surrounding the whole. The preserved ducal tower in Siedlęcin, Jelenia Góra district, Dolnośląskie Voivodeship, is an example of this type of a luxurious residential and defensive structure of a wealthy feudal lord.

Visitor access. The site is accessible all year round.

Author of the note: Michał Bugaj, Regional Branch of the National Institute of Cultural Heritage in Katowice, 20.10.2017

Bibliography

• Bugaj M., Relikty obronnych, drewniano-ziemnych siedzib rycerskich i możnowładczych w krajobrazie rzecznym województwa śląskiego w aspekcie konserwatorskim. Wiadomości Konserwatorskie Województwa Śląskiego 7 (Woda), 169-188. 2015.
• Gorgolewski W., Tomczak E., Grodziska Górnego Śląska i Zagłębia Dąbrowskiego z lotu ptaka. Katowice 1996.
• Guerquin B., Zamki w Polsce. Warsaw 1984.
• Kajzer L., Archeologiczny rodowód dworu. Przemiany siedzib obronno-rezydencjonalnych Polski centralnej w późnym średniowieczu i czasach nowożytnych. Łódź 1988.
• Kajzer L., Grodziska średniowieczne i nowożytne, Prace i Materiały Muzeum Archeologicznego i Etnograficznego w Łodzi, no. 36, pp. 33-43. 1989-1990.
• Kajzer L., Kołodziejski S., Salm J., Leksykon zamków w Polsce. Warsaw 2007.
• Kamińska J., Grodziska stożkowate śladem posiadłości rycerskich XIII-XIV w., Prace i Materiały Muzeum Archeologicznego i Etnograficznego w Łodzi, no. 13, pp. 43-78. 1966.
• Kamińska J., Próba podsumowania nowszych badań nad grodziskami stożkowatymi, Prace i Materiały Muzeum Archeologicznego i Etnograficznego w Łodzi, Seria Archeologiczna, no. 25, pp. 169-177. 1978.
• Kaźmierczyk J., Z badań nad grodami i miastami wczesnego średniowiecza na Śląsku, Archeologia Polski, vol. 10, z. 2, pp. 655-700. 1966.
• Kaźmierczyk J., Macewicz K., Wuszkan S., Studia i materiały do osadnictwa Opolszczyzny wczesnośredniowiecznej, Opole 1977.
• Marciniak-Kajzer A., Średniowieczny dwór rycerski w Polsce. Wizerunek archeologiczny. Łódź 2011.
• Pawłowski A., Jak budowano obronne siedziby rycerskie? Z otchłani wieków, r. 46 (1), pp. 75-80. 1980.
• Tomczak E., Mało znane warownie Górnego Śląska. Katowice 2012.